Last night I watched the much touted Japanese movie "Seven Samurai" I love the old west re-make "The Magnificent Seven" so I figured that it was about time I go to the classic. I have to first say, I was not disappointed.Other then the great use of archetype what caught my attention and spoke volumes to me about the Japanese philosophy of the Samurai code came near the beginning. The lead hero "Kambei" a aging and crafty warrior comes upon a village where a thief being discovered by the villagers at night had taken a child hostage and was held up in a barn. No one dared approach the criminal for fear that he would kill the child. Making a quick assessment of the situation Kambei goes to a stream shaves his head and takes on the clothing of a monk.
In his disguise he approaches the barn with two rice balls to offer the criminal to eat and give to the child. The criminal protests his approach but Kambei reassures him that he is simply a monk who has come to offer food. He then opens the door taking a squatting position observing the situation inside, when he sees that the time is right he leaps into the barn. You see nothing of what happens only hearing a scuffle, then the robber comes stumbling out of the barn, standing dazed for a second and then falls dead to the ground. Kambei then emerges from the building having saved the child and slain the offender.
What stuck out to me about this interaction was the clearly displayed contempt the director and actors showed for the thief. In western movies of today we would not be allowed to simply slay the offender, we would have to have him removed with "less then lethal" means and then we would have to have a long back story on why the poor criminal was turned to a life of crime. We have become a society in many ways that seeks to justify bad behavior with a multiple camouflages other then simply seeing the problem as "if your a criminal you are below respect."Heck our society even has become one that in many ways glorifies the criminal while mocking the law abiding honorable person. The cause of this could be any number of things however in my own mind the cause seems to be that we seek to justify the negative actions of others because we know that some day we will be in need of some kind of justification for our own actions that we know are dishonorable. In our collective minds we seek to justify others misdeeds so that in the end when the table is eventually turned hopefully that same action will be repaid to us.
However wishful this may be from what I have seen Satan and any other cohort is all to willing to sell us down the river for our dishonorable actions. Inevitably when we are the criminal locked in the barn holding a emotional hostage for justification we will be the one left too die alone. The only recourse is to truly live an honorable truthful life and then expecting the same from others, distancing ourselves from those who prove less then honorable.
Perhaps we should also keep in balance the teachings of Christ who often taught to pray and love those that offend us and who do wrongs to us. There is within the gospel of Christ a need to turn the other cheek . Christ Himself turned those away who wished to stone an adulterous woman. These actions were not considered endorsements by the Savior for engaging in acts of crime or sins against God, but rather a higher law of love.
ReplyDeleteJustice has its place, but we should not be so concerned with meting out that justice. You are correct M. Galt in that we should find our best course of action to not be guilty of the crimes others commit. However, I would seek to not be preoccupied with the sins of others and in pursuing punishments as much as I would be in making sure that I do all I can to keep the laws of God and the land.
I would be preoccupied with giving everyone hugs. Hippies aren't the only ones that want peace on earth. I truly believe we can all live in a utopian love fest.
ReplyDeleteWith the lord there seems to be a time for all things. Jesus turned the other cheek, Helaman put to death, those who demurred commitment to the standard of liberty. Elijah slew the priest's of Bal, Nephi endured the tribulations inflicted by his brothers.
ReplyDeleteEach person is given the spirit of revelation, or in a more secular verbiage. Different stroke's for different folks.
I think that something M. Galt touched on though is the justification that society gives to criminals. "He only did it because he didn't have a possitive roll model in the house." is one excuse we hear often. The justification for the child or adults bad behavior is what he is talking about, not judgement. The judgement comment seemed to be more geared toward why people try to justify, hoping that someone will do the same for them later. Justice will be achieved but so will mercy. We can not mistake mercy for justification. If someone sins against you there should be forgiveness. If someone breaks the law, they need to be punished according to the law. Justify the action all you want but that will not save you in the end and it will not help the plantiff either. The old adage is one I hope to justly live by, spare the rod spoil the child. I will not run around beating my kids, but I will enforce punishment for bad behavior and if a spanking is in order then it will be done. Obviously followed by an outpouring of love as counseled in the scriptures and from the prophets. That is what I took from this post. I liked it a lot. Thank M. Galt.
ReplyDelete